Supreme court orders Erap to explain disqualification case in 10 days
The high court orders the former President and Manila Mayor-elect Joseph Estrada to explain the alleged disqualification case filed against him last May.
The Supreme Court Public Information Office Chief and spokesman Theodore Te said, the high court requires Estrada and the Commission on Elections (Comelec) to comment on the petition filed by lawyer Alicia Risos-Vidal-a known lawyer of outgoing Manila mayor Alfredo Lim.
"The court has ordered the Comelec and mayor-elect Joseph Estrada to comment on the petition within 10 days from notice," said Te.
The Comelec, last April 1, denied Vidal's petition, saying it was "glaringly similar or intertwined" with the disqualification case filed against Estrada in 2010 when he ran for president. Vidal moved for the reconsideration of the ruling, but the poll body denied her request on April 23.
Atty. Vidal decided to file the case with the SC and stressed that Estrada's conviction for plunder and his being sentenced to life imprisonment had rendered him disqualified to run for public office. She also said the executive pardon granted to him by former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo specifically did not restore his right to run for public office.
Estrada defeated Lim in the May 13 elections and was proclaimed mayor-elect on May 14 after the Comelec lowered the threshold of votes needed to proclaim a winner. The victory marked the return to office of one of the country's most popular politicians.
In 2007, Estrada was convicted of plunder and sentenced to life in prison, but was pardoned by then-President Arroyo months later. He came in second to President Benigno Aquino III in the 2010 presidential race. - GMA news
COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER: Should you, or your organization, possess the copyright to any images attached on our main entries and you are able to prove such claim, please contact the webmaster at your earliest convenience. Use of these materials (images,embedded videos, etc.) are not intended as a copyright infringement on any of the artist or any other entity's copyrighted material.
comments powered by Disqus